Smoking Bans at Work and Public Places Result in Significant Drops in Hospitalization for Heart Attacks, Strokes and Asthma.
Posted on November 12, 2012 Comments (0)
Laws that end smoking at work and other public places result in significantly fewer hospitalizations for heart attacks, strokes, asthma and other respiratory conditions, a new UCSF analysis has found.
The research provides evidence that smoke-free laws that cover workplaces, restaurants and bars have the biggest impacts on hospitalizations, reduce health care costs and also raise quality of life, the researchers said. The research is published in closed science journal; for an “association” (when you act as though your focus is just growing your income I have trouble seeing the claim for being an association as legitimate) to do that is particularly pitiful. Adding to the sad commentary on the lack of respect for open scient this is research done by a “public” university with grants from the federal government. So sad how little some that should care about science do when it conflicts with their outdated notions of how to publicize research. We really should not tolerate such behavior.
“The public, health professionals, and policy makers need to understand that including exemptions and loopholes in legislation — such as exempting casinos — condemns more people to end up in emergency rooms,” said senior author Stanton A. Glantz, UCSF professor of medicine and director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education at UCSF. “These unnecessary hospitalizations are the real cost of failing to enact comprehensive smoke-free legislation,” he said.
The inquiry consisted of a meta-analysis of 45 studies published prior to Nov. 30, 2011. Altogether, the research covered 33 different smoke-free-laws in cities and states around the United States as well as several countries, including New Zealand and Germany. The laws variously prohibit smoking in such public spots as restaurants, bars, and the workplace.
The authors found that comprehensive smoke-free laws were followed rapidly by significantly lower rates of hospital admissions than before the laws went into force:
- A 15% drop in heart attack hospitalizations;
- A 16% drop in stroke hospitalizations;
- A 24% drop in hospitalizations for respiratory diseases including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Laws that were more comprehensive in scope — that included restaurants and bars as well as workplaces — were followed by larger changes in risk, the authors said. Moreover, the decrease in hospitalizations applied similarly to women and to men, the researchers found.
The authors noted several studies that showed an additional benefit: lower health care costs connected to smoking-related illnesses.
“Smoke-free legislation…reduces exposure of nonsmokers to secondhand smoke and creates an environment that helps smokers cut down or quit smoking,” the authors wrote. “The passage of these laws reflects changes in social norms that also affect smoking behavior; the laws both formalize and accelerate this social change and the associated health benefits.”
The research was supported by National Cancer Institute grants CA-61021 and CA-87472 and yet they still allowed it to be published in a closed journal; this is a pitiful decision. Read the full press release.
Related: The Difference Between Smoking & Vaporizing – Medical Studies Showing Largest Benefits Often Prove to be False – Physical Activity for Adults: Inactivity Leads to 5.3 Million Early Deaths a Year – It is pitiful that an organization calling itself the “American Cancer Society” practices closed science – Healthy Diet, Healthy Living, Healthy Weight