<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net</link>
	<description>Science and Engineering: Innovation, Research, Education and Economics</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>USA Science Losing Ground</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/21/usa-science-losing-ground/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/21/usa-science-losing-ground/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 14:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have written about the continued decline in the relative position of science in the USA compared to the rest of the world: Engineering the Future Economy - Economic Strength Through Technology Leadership - The Best Research Universities - U.S. Slipping on Science - Diplomacy and Science Research - Scientists and Engineers in Congress.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have written about the continued decline in the relative position of science in the USA compared to the rest of the world: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/09/17/engineering-the-future-economy/">Engineering the Future Economy</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/07/07/economic-strength-through-technology-leadership/">Economic Strength Through Technology Leadership</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/08/13/best-research-university-rankings-2007/">The Best Research Universities</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/03/27/us-slipping-on-science/">U.S. Slipping on Science</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/08/21/diplomacy-and-science-research/">Diplomacy and Science Research</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/scientists-and-engineers-in-congress/">Scientists and Engineers in Congress</a>.  The USA continues to act as though the rewards for scientific excellence automatically go to the USA.  That isn&#8217;t the case and as many other countries make smart investments in scientific centers of excellence the USA chooses to do very little. </p>
<p><a href="http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/2008/429/1">Has U.S. Science Lost Its Competitive Edge?</a></p>
<div class="cite">Craig Barrett, former CEO of Intel, delivered perhaps the most stinging indictment of the current political system. &#8220;There will be winners and losers, and the losers are the ones who insist on looking backwards,&#8221; said Barrett. &#8220;We continue to subsidize 19th century technology&#8211;like in the $290 billion farm bill&#8211;rather than the 21st century technologies that will allow us to remain competitive. We&#8217;re fat, dumb, and happy.&#8221;<br />
&#8230;<br />
hefty increases at three science agencies&#8211;the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy Office of Science, and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Last summer, legislation that incorporates many of those recommendations became law. But funding for most of the initiatives has yet to materialize.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Speakers repeatedly pointed to those anemic budgets as evidence that politicians haven&#8217;t realized the threats to American preeminence in science posed by the rest of the world.</div>
<p>As I have said many times the consequences of failing to take sensible action today will be large.  The importance of science and engineering centers of excellence is a <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/01/the-future-is-engineering/">very important factor for economic success</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/21/usa-science-losing-ground/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NSF Graduate Research Fellows 2008</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/20/nsf-graduate-research-fellows/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/20/nsf-graduate-research-fellows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 15:02:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Fellowships, Scholarships]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engineering education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engineers]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fellowships]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[NSF]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The National Science Foundation&#8217;s Graduate Research Fellowship Program aims to ensure the vitality of the human resource base of science and engineering in the United States and to reinforce its diversity. The program recognizes and supports outstanding graduate students in the relevant science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines who are pursuing research-based master&#8217;s and doctoral [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="left" src="/images/sarah_lukes.jpg" alt="photo of Sarah Lukes" /></p>
<p>The <a href="https://www.nsfgradfellows.org/">National Science Foundation&#8217;s Graduate Research Fellowship Program</a> aims to ensure the vitality of the human resource base of science and engineering in the United States and to reinforce its diversity. The program recognizes and supports outstanding graduate students in the relevant science, technology, engineering, and mathematics disciplines who are pursuing research-based master&#8217;s and doctoral degrees.</p>
<p>This year NSF awarded 913 fellowships: which come with a stipend of $30,000 and $10,500 cost of education allowance.  On the <a href="http://blogs.asee.org/fellowships/">ASEE Science and Engineering Fellowship blog</a>, that <a href="http://johnhunter.com/johnhunter/plife.cfm">I manage in my full time job</a> with the American Society for Engineering Education (the Curious Cat Science and Engineering blog is my own and not related to ASEE), we highlight awardees including: <a href="http://blogs.asee.org/fellowships/nsf-research-fellowship-for-two-montana-state-students/">Sarah Lukes</a> mechanical engineering graduate working on her PhD at Montana State University; <a href="http://blogs.asee.org/fellowships/nsf-fellow-ben-safdi/">Ben Safdi</a>, engineering physics and applied mathematics dual major at Colorado University - Boulder; <a href="http://blogs.asee.org/fellowships/5-cmu-undergraduate-students-receive-nsf-grf/">Henry Deyoung</a>, computer science major at Carnegie Mellon University, <a href="http://blogs.asee.org/fellowships/nsf-fellow-jennifer-robinson/">Jennifer Robinson</a>, computer science major at North Carolina State; <a href="http://blogs.asee.org/fellowships/two-swarthmore-seniors-awarded-nsf-grf/">Lydia Thé</a>, biology major at Swarthmore; and <a href="http://blogs.asee.org/fellowships/nsf-fellow-julia-kamenetzky/">Julia Kamenetzky</a>, physics major at Cornell College.</p>
<p>Fellows from previous years include: <a href="http://nsfgradfellows.org/fellows/sergey_brin.cfm">Sergey Brin</a>, <a href="http://www.nsfgradfellows.org/fellows/david_politzer.cfm">H. David Politzer</a> and <a href="http://www.nsfgradfellows.org/fellows/eric_maskin.cfm">Eric Maskin</a>.</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/10/14/proposal-to-triple-nsf-gfrp-awards-and-the-size-of-the-awards-by-33/">Proposal to Triple NSF GFRP Awards and the Size of the Awards by 33%</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/12/06/increasing-american-scientists-and-engineering-fellowship-support/">Increasing American Fellowship Support for Scientists and Engineers</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/science-and-engineering-scholarships-and-fellowships/">Science and Engineering Scholarships and Fellowships Directory</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/20/nsf-graduate-research-fellows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Subtly Different Squid Eye</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/19/the-subtly-different-squid-eye/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/19/the-subtly-different-squid-eye/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 14:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Life Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[animals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[genes]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[protein]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The subtly different squid eye by PZ Myers:
the inside out organization of the cephalopod eye relative to ours: they have photoreceptors that face towards the light, while we have photoreceptors that are facing away from the light. There are other important differences, though, some of which came out in a recent Nature podcast with Adam [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2008/05/the_subtly_different_squid_eye.php">The subtly different squid eye</a> by PZ Myers:</p>
<div class="cite">the inside out organization of the cephalopod eye relative to ours: they have photoreceptors that face towards the light, while we have photoreceptors that are facing away from the light. There are other important differences, though, some of which came out in a recent <a href="http://sos343-1-dl.edgesuite.net/nature/podcast/v453/n7193/.uid.MSK-AAAvgk-Jmx5PpQ438a8a34be557a1e84cdd54884af5e2e.nature-2008-05-15.mp3?sauth=1210869923_f718447d9a43fb482c8696a3452c5771&#038;ext=.mp3&#038;ct=audio/mpeg">Nature podcast</a> with Adam Rutherford, which was prompted by a recent publication on the structure of squid rhodopsin.</p>
<p>Superficially, squid eyes resemble ours. Both are simple camera eyes with a lens that projects an image onto a retina, but the major details of these eyes evolved independently - the last common ancestor probably had little more than a patch of light sensitive cells with an opsin-based photopigment. The general properties of this ancient eye can still be seen in modern eyes. They detect light with a simple molecule called retinal that is capable of absorbing a photon, changing its shape from the 11-cis form to the all trans form; basically, it flips from a chain with a kink to a straight chain. Retinal is imbedded in a protein called opsin. When retinal changes shape, it changes the shape of the opsin protein, too, which can then interact with other proteins in the cell membrane.</p>
<p>The next protein in the sequence is called a G protein. G proteins are ubiquitous intermediates for many cellular processes; when a receptor, like opsin, is activated, it activates a G protein, which then activates other proteins, starting a signaling cascade. In the podcast, I compare this to starting an avalanche. Opsin is an agent standing on a hill; when it receives a light signal, it nudges a small boulder (the G protein), which then tumbles down setting a whole series of rocks in motion. The G protein is an intermediate which takes a small change, the initial nudge, and amplifies it into the activation of many other proteins.</p></div>
<p>Related: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/11/09/how-brain-resolves-sight/">How the Human Brain Resolves Sight</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/09/10/scientists-discover-how-our-eyes-focus-when-we-read/">Scientists Discover How Our Eyes Focus When We Read</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/05/05/3-d-images-of-eyes/">3-D Images of Eyes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/19/the-subtly-different-squid-eye/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
<enclosure url="http://sos343-1-dl.edgesuite.net/nature/podcast/v453/n7193/.uid.MSK-AAAvgk-Jmx5PpQ438a8a34be557a1e84cdd54884af5e2e.nature-2008-05-15.mp3?sauth=1210869923_f718447d9a43fb482c8696a3452c5771&amp;ext=.mp3&amp;ct=audio/mpeg" length="174" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Marketing Drugs</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/17/marketing-drugs/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/17/marketing-drugs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 14:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[drugs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Melody Petersen, author of  Our Daily Meds: How the Pharmaceutical Companies Transformed Themselves into Slick Marketing Machines on Bill Moyer&#8217;s Journal:

I actually thought that they were a lot about science. That&#8217;s what they tell the public. They are all about science and discovering new drugs. But as I started to follow their daily activities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melody Petersen, author of  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0374228272/worldwidedemingw">Our Daily Meds: How the Pharmaceutical Companies Transformed Themselves into Slick Marketing Machines</a> on <a href="http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/05162008/profile.html">Bill Moyer&#8217;s Journal</a>:</p>
<div class="cite">
<blockquote>I actually thought that they were a lot about science. That&#8217;s what they tell the public. They are all about science and discovering new drugs. But as I started to follow their daily activities and talk to executives, I learned that really it was marketing that drove them.</p></blockquote>
<p>According to Petersen, the rewards have been large. America has become the top consumer of prescription drugs in the world, with nearly 65% of the population on physician-prescribed medication. In 2005, Americans spent $250 billion dollars on such drugs. This consumption made pharmaceuticals the most profitable business sector in America from 1995-2002.<br />
&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>We&#8217;ve come to a time when decisions on how to treat a disease have as great a chance of being hatched in a corporate marketing department as by a group of independent doctors working to improve the public&#8217;s health.</p></blockquote>
</div>
<p>Unfortunately patients are driven more by marketing than medicine. Much worse though, <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/03/22/antibiotics-too-often-prescribed-for-sinus-woes/">doctors seem to bend to these patients marketing driven desires</a>.  Plus the corrupting influence of money on research and marketing to doctors seems likely a significant reason for the <a href="http://investing.curiouscatblog.net/2008/02/09/international-health-care-system-performance/">poor performance and high cost of USA health care</a>.</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/07/15/lifestyle-drugs-and-risk/">Lifestyle Drugs and Risk</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/08/10/overrelience-on-perscription-drugs-to-aid-childrens-sleep/">Overrelience on Prescription Drugs to Aid Children&#8217;s Sleep?</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/03/17/drug-price-crisis/">Drug Price Crisis</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/04/18/medical-study-integrity-or-lack-thereof/">Lack of Medical Study Integrity</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/17/marketing-drugs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Challenging the Science Status Quo</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/16/challenging-the-science-status-quo/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/16/challenging-the-science-status-quo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nobel laureate]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scientific inquiry]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[scientists]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Challenging Science
When scientists question facets of existing theories or propose new ones, they present the best evidence available and make the strongest arguments they can to their colleagues. Colleagues in turn challenge that evidence and reasoning. The rigor of this process is what makes science such a powerful tool.
&#8230;
Lynn Margulis wrote a paper, “The Origin [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.expelledexposed.com/index.php/the-truth/challenging">Challenging Science</a></p>
<div class="cite">When scientists question facets of existing theories or propose new ones, they present the best evidence available and make the strongest arguments they can to their colleagues. Colleagues in turn challenge that evidence and reasoning. The rigor of this process is what makes science such a powerful tool.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Lynn Margulis wrote a paper, “The Origin of Mitosing Eukaryotic Cells,” which argued that eukaryotic cells – those with a true nucleus – arose when cells with no nucleus symbiotically incorporated other such cells to make new cells that could perform more functions. The paper was rejected by many journals, and when eventually published by The Journal of Theoretical Biology it was highly criticized. Margulis spent decades defending her work, but scientists now accept her suggested mechanism through which organelles such as mitochondria and chloroplasts evolved. Her suggestions about other organelles have not stood up to experimental tests, and are not as widely accepted.<br />
&#8230;<br />
In 1982, Stanley Prusiner published an article on his research into scrapie – a disease in sheep related to Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease – which argued that the infectious agent was not a virus but a protein, which Prusiner called a &#8220;prion&#8221;. Because no one had heard of a protein replicating without a nucleic acid like DNA or RNA, many virologists and scrapie researchers reacted to the article with incredulity. When the media picked up the story, &#8220;the personal attacks of the naysayers at times became very vicious,&#8221; according to Prusiner. However, his critics failed to find the nucleic acid they were sure existed, and less than two years later, Prusiner’s lab had isolated the protein. Subsequent research provided even more support for prions, and in 1997 Prusiner was awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.</div>
<p>Related: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/01/05/evolution-is-fundamental-to-science/">Evolution is Fundamental to Science</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/02/24/scientists-search-for-clues-to-bee-mystery/">Scientists Search for Clues To Bee Mystery</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/12/17/the-state-of-physics/">The State of Physics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/16/challenging-the-science-status-quo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wind Power Potential to Produce 20% of Electricity Supply by 2030</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/15/wind-power-potential-to-produce-20-of-electricity-supply-by-2030/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/15/wind-power-potential-to-produce-20-of-electricity-supply-by-2030/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 13:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[green]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wind power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind energy has been growing tremendously.   In 2000 there were 2,500 megawatts (MW) of installed wind capacity in the United States. By the end of 2007, the U.S. installed capacity exceeded 16,000. A recent Department of Energy report sees the potential to provide up to 20% of our nation&#8217;s electrical supply via wind [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind energy has been growing tremendously.   In 2000 there were 2,500 megawatts (MW) of installed wind capacity in the United States. By the end of 2007, the U.S. installed capacity exceeded 16,000. A recent Department of Energy report sees the potential to <a href="http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/pdfs/41869.pdf">provide up to 20% of our nation&#8217;s electrical supply via wind power by 2030</a>.</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/02/28/global-wind-power-installed-capacity/">Global Wind Power Installed Capacity</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/12/02/electricity-savings/">Electricity Savings</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/11/27/google-investing-huge-sums-in-renewable-energy-and-is-hiring/">Google Investing Huge Sums in Renewable Energy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/15/wind-power-potential-to-produce-20-of-electricity-supply-by-2030/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cosmology Questions Answered</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/13/cosmology-questions-answered/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/13/cosmology-questions-answered/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 14:58:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[science explained]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[science facts]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A great list of Cosmology Questions Answered, including: Why do we think that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating? What is quintessence? What is the Universe expanding into?
Everything that we measure is within the Universe, and we see no edge or boundary or center of expansion. Thus the Universe is not expanding into anything [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great list of <a href="http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmology_faq.html">Cosmology Questions Answered</a>, including: Why do we think that the expansion of the Universe is accelerating? What is quintessence? What is the Universe expanding into?</p>
<div class="cite">Everything that we measure is within the Universe, and we see no edge or boundary or center of expansion. Thus the Universe is not expanding into anything that we can see, and this is not a profitable thing to think about. Just as Dali&#8217;s Corpus Hypercubicus is just a 2-D picture of a 3-D object that represents the surface of a 4-D cube, remember that the balloon analogy is just a 2-D picture of a 3-D situation that is supposed to help you think about a curved 3-D space, but it does not mean that there is really a 4-D space that the Universe is expanding into.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/13/cosmology-questions-answered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brian Cox Particle Physics Webcast</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/12/brian-cox-particle-physics-webcast/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/12/brian-cox-particle-physics-webcast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:40:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[CERN]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[physics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[TED]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[webcasts]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
TED webcast of Brian Cox discussing his work at CERN&#8217;s Large Hadron Collider.  He does a very good job of explaining some of the basic science in understandable terms.
Related: At the Heart of All Matter - New Yorker on CERN’s Large Hadron Collider - Physicists Observe New Property of Matter
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=8,0,0,0" width="432" height="285" id="VE_Player" align="middle"><param name="movie" value="http://static.videoegg.com/ted2/flash/loader.swf"><PARAM NAME="FlashVars" VALUE="bgColor=FFFFFF&#038;file=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/movies/BrianCox_2008_high.flv&#038;autoPlay=false&#038;fullscreenURL=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/flash/fullscreen.html&#038;forcePlay=false&#038;logo=&#038;allowFullscreen=true"><param name="quality" value="high"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF"><param name="scale" value="noscale"><param name="wmode" value="window"><embed src="http://static.videoegg.com/ted2/flash/loader.swf" FlashVars="bgColor=FFFFFF&#038;file=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/movies/BrianCox_2008_high.flv&#038;autoPlay=false&#038;fullscreenURL=http://static.videoegg.com/ted/flash/fullscreen.html&#038;forcePlay=false&#038;logo=&#038;allowFullscreen=true" quality="high" allowScriptAccess="always" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" scale="noscale" wmode="window" width="432" height="285" name="VE_Player" align="middle" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></object></p>
<p><a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/tag/ted/">TED webcast</a> of Brian Cox discussing his work at CERN&#8217;s Large Hadron Collider.  He does a very good job of explaining some of the basic science in understandable terms.</p>
<p>Related: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/02/27/at-the-heart-of-all-matter/">At the Heart of All Matter</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/05/11/new-yorker-on-cerns-large-hadron-collider/">New Yorker on CERN’s Large Hadron Collider</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/11/05/physicists-observe-new-property-of-matter/">Physicists Observe New Property of Matter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/12/brian-cox-particle-physics-webcast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Running Out of Fish</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/11/running-out-of-fish/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/11/running-out-of-fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 12:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Life Science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[fish]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[food]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[ocean]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have posted before about the overfishing problems: Fishless Future - SelFISHing - Chinook Salmon Vanish Without a Trace. Here is an emotional article on the problem - How the world&#8217;s oceans are running out of fish
Ninety years of industrial-scale exploitation of fish has, he and most scientists agree, led to &#8216;ecological meltdown&#8217;. Whole biological [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have posted before about the overfishing problems: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/11/05/fishy-future/">Fishless Future</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/01/24/selfishing/">SelFISHing</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/03/18/chinook-salmon-vanish-without-a-trace/">Chinook Salmon Vanish Without a Trace</a>. Here is an emotional article on the problem - <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2008/may/11/fishing.food">How the world&#8217;s oceans are running out of fish</a></p>
<div class="cite">Ninety years of industrial-scale exploitation of fish has, he and most scientists agree, led to &#8216;ecological meltdown&#8217;. Whole biological food chains have been destroyed.<br />
&#8230;<br />
In 2002, the year an EU report revealed that the Senegalese fish biomass had declined 75 per cent in 15 years, Brussels bought rights for four years&#8217; fishing of tuna and bottom-dwelling fish on the Senegal coasts, for just $4m a year. In 2006, access for 43 giant EU factory fishing vessels to Mauritania&#8217;s long coastline was bought for £24.3m a year. It&#8217;s estimated that these deals have put 400,000 west African fishermen out of work; some of them now take to the sea only as ferrymen for desperate would-be migrants to the Canary Islands and Europe.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Protecting up to 40 per cent of the world&#8217;s oceans in permanent refuges would enable the recovery of fish stocks and help replenish surrounding fisheries. &#8216;The cost, according to a 2004 survey, would be between £7bn and £8.2bn a year, after set-up. But put that against the £17.6bn a year we currently spend on harmful subsidies that encourage overfishing.&#8217;<br />
&#8230;<br />
The Newfoundland cod fishery, for 500 years the world&#8217;s greatest, was exhausted and closed in 1992, and there&#8217;s still no evidence of any return of the fish. Once stocks dip below a certain critical level, the scientists believe, they can never recover because the entire eco-system has changed.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/11/running-out-of-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Engineering Graduates Again in Great Shape</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/09/engineering-graduates-again-in-great-shape/</link>
		<comments>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/09/engineering-graduates-again-in-great-shape/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>curiouscat</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Career]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Engineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Students]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[computer science]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engeineering]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[engineering education]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[India]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/?p=1700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once again engineering and computer science graduates are receiving the highest starting salaries.  Previous posts: Lucrative college degrees (2006) - starting salaries for engineers (2005) - High Pay for Engineering Graduates 2007.
According to a survey, these are the top-paying majors for 2007-08 bachelor degree graduates:
  $63,616 &#8212; Chemical engineering (up 6.5%)
  $59,962 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Once again engineering and computer science graduates are receiving the highest starting salaries.  Previous posts: <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2006/07/16/lucrative-college-degrees/">Lucrative college degrees (2006)</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/20/shortage-of-engineers/">starting salaries for engineers (2005)</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/07/29/high-pay-for-engineering-graduates-july-2007/">High Pay for Engineering Graduates 2007</a>.</p>
<p>According to a survey, these are the top-paying majors for 2007-08 bachelor degree graduates:<br />
  $63,616 &#8212; Chemical engineering (up 6.5%)<br />
  $59,962 &#8212; Computer engineering<br />
  $59,873 &#8212; Computer science (up 14.7%)<br />
  $58,252 &#8212; Industrial/manufacturing engineering<br />
  $57,821 &#8212; Mechanical engineering (up 5.7%)<br />
  $57,999 &#8212; Aerospace/aeronautical/astronautical engineering</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.news-leader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080428/NEWS01/804280376/1007">Spring Survey, National Association of Colleges and Employers</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.industryweek.com/ReadArticle.aspx?ArticleID=16212&#038;SectionID=1">Engineering Jobs Top U.S. Skills Shortage List</a></p>
<div class="cite">Engineering positions are the most difficult jobs to fill for U.S. employers, according to Manpower Inc.&#8217;s 2008 Talent Shortage Survey released April 24. Of 2,000 U.S. firms responding, 22% said they had difficulty filling positions, ranking engineers, machinists/machine operators and skilled manual trades as the top three toughest positions to fill, respectively</div>
<p><a href="http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2008/04/13/news/top_news/docaf3cfc170d9832d18625742900097d57.txt">Grads&#8217; job prospects weakening by degrees</a></p>
<div class="cite">In one year, the former hydraulic repairman will have a bachelor&#8217;s degree in mechanical engineering from Purdue University Calumet. And, as far as he can tell, he can write his own ticket.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;m finding jobs pulling at me left and right,&#8221; he said last week at a manufacturing industry job fair at the college. &#8220;The professors told us there&#8217;s such a demand, if you go to a job fair, you can walk out with a job.&#8221;</p>
<p>Vela, 35, happens to be in a field where demand remains strong, despite the uneven economy.  Overall starting wages for mechanical engineering grads will be up 3.4 percent this year, with an average salary offer of $56,429, according to the National Association of Colleges and Employers.  For many other college grads looking for a job at this time of year, the prospects are not as sweet.</p></div>
<p>Related: <a href="http://www1.umn.edu/umnnews/news_details.php?release=080502_3522&#038;page=UMNN">Career Center report high increase in demand for computer science graduates</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/01/26/it-employment-hits-new-high-again/">IT Employment Hits New High Again</a> - <a href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2007/06/05/sp-500-ceos-again-engineering-graduates-lead/">S&#038;P 500 CEOs - Again Engineering Graduates Lead</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/higher/starting-salaries-what-the-future-holds-814362.html">Starting salaries: What the future holds (UK)</a><br />
<span id="more-1700"></span></p>
<div class="cite">It certainly pays to be a scientist. The statistics show that eight out of the highest 10 starting salaries go to graduates with science-related degrees. The other categories that do all right are graduates of economics and social work. The average starting salary for economics graduates is £24,466 and for social workers £22,560. Salaries for mathematics graduates are also firmly in the top 20.</p>
<p>It really does make sense to go into engineering, if you have the right A-levels because most engineering degrees lead to well-paid jobs. The aspiring chemical engineer can earn £25,136, and the civil engineer £22,392 in their first job. Engineering is better paid than computer science, widely regarded as a sensible option for those who are interested in technology.</p></div>
<p> <a href="http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/2008/04/12/stories/2008041251700400.htm">IT graduate salaries Surge 17% in India over the last 2 years</a></p>
<div class="cite">Campus salaries in IT companies have jumped 17.6 per cent in the last two years across domains with 71 per cent of the students receiving salary between Rs 3 lakh and Rs 5 lakh.</p>
<p>This year, the average annual IT services pay packets have risen to Rs 2.74 lakh taking it closer to the average annual product company compensation (Rs 4.63 lakh) in the country, though some product companies pay almost 70 per cent higher salaries than services companies.</p>
<p>In a campus compensation and student perception survey brought out by CareerNet, a Bangalore-based recruitment company, it was found that while in financial year 2007, about 44 per cent of the students took home a sub-Rs 3 lakh per annum pay packet, this year only 12.6 per cent received salaries less than Rs 3 lakh.</p>
<p>And 17 per cent of the students managed to get more than Rs 5 lakh annual salary.  Graduate hiring across all companies have increased by almost 50 per cent.  Last year, about 15-20 per cent of the campus hires in the Big Five Indian IT services firms were science or computer science graduate, while this year, almost 30 per cent of those hired will be graduates.</p></div>
<p><a href="http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20080504/NEWS/367925522/-1/LINKS">Demand high for technical grads</a></p>
<div class="cite">>The market for engineers is relatively high, especially for mechanical engineers,&#8217; he said with confidence, citing the presence of large employers such as NASA in Huntsville that have a continuous need for engineers.<br />
&#8230;<br />
Participants in Shelton State&#8217;s technical programs, however, are unlikely to experience that problem anytime soon. Job Placement Center representative Mike Fields said about 95 percent of the 200 or so students about to graduate with two-year technical or associates degrees already have jobs.  &#8216;On the technical side, the job market is still very, very strong, Fields said. &#8216;It&#8217;s been that way for some time.&#8217;</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2008/05/09/engineering-graduates-again-in-great-shape/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
