Chinook Salmon Vanish Without a Trace
Whatever the cause, there was widespread agreement among those attending a five-day meeting of the Pacific Fisheries Management Council here last week that the regional $150 million fishery, which usually opens for the four-month season on May 1, is almost certain to remain closed this year from northern Oregon to the Mexican border.
…
So what happened? As Dave Bitts, a fisherman based in Eureka in Northern California, sees it, the variables are simple. “To survive, there are two things a salmon needs,” he said. “To eat. And not to be eaten.”
Fragmentary evidence about salmon mortality in the Sacramento River in recent years, as well as more robust but still inconclusive data about ocean conditions in 2005, indicates that the fall Chinook smolts, or baby fish, of 2005 may have lost out on both counts. But biologists, fishermen and fishery managers all emphasize that no one yet knows anything for sure.
Related: Fishless Future - Dead Zones in the Ocean
Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog © curiouscat.com 2005-2008 powered by WordPress
Curious Cat Alumni Connections
March 19th, 2008 at 12:23 am
It’s nice to see the efforts to determine the cause of the absence of Chinook salmon in the Sacramento River. Too often today, blame assessment is the first priority and resolving a problem is secondary. I would expect a full recovery, with or without human intervention.
June 30th, 2008 at 10:46 am
it’s sad….something wrong must be happened in the sea….perhaps these salmons get lost or poisoned in the way.
It’s time to do an extensive on Chinook Salmon from the remaining salmons….but the narrow genetic pools will make it vulnerable to diseases