|
|
|
|
|
|
I have written before about false research findings. This is an important topic - we need to remember that the interpritation of one study (or many studies) in not necessarily conclusive. Another article - When Medical Studies Collide:
How could two studies come to such different conclusions—especially when there have been no new trials of the herb? While the New England Journal reported on one clinical trial, authors of the latest report combined data from previous studies, a controversial approach called a meta-analysis. Its conclusion is dramatically different—not just from that of the New England Journal paper, but also from a review last year of the same studies.
…
The problem is, the world of medical and health research is messier than most people realize. Black-and-white answers are rare, even when it comes to a single drug trial.
Just remember those last two sentences. Very simple. And most people would agree if you showed them those two sentences and asked if they agreed. But then they see a headline and away they go… Just force yourself to repeat that idea every time you see a health report. Don’t believe the headline without strong support.
An interesting tidbit from the article. The coneflower is the source of echinacea. I tried to find photos that I am pretty sure I have on my hard drive of the flowers in my back yard, but I couldn’t.
Related: Correlation is Not Causation - Another Paper Questions Scientific Paper Accuracy
Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog © curiouscat.com 2005-2008 powered by WordPress
Curious Cat Alumni Connections
April 18th, 2008 at 8:29 am
but those organization should not be trusted to provide honest and balanced opinions they should be expected to provide biased opinions…