I believe the way to deal with the need for energy resources should be primarily science and economics based. I do not think it should be based on who can best reward politicians for giving them a bunch of federal dollars. Ethanol Craze Cools As Doubts Multiply by Lauren Etter, Wall Street Journal
I am skeptical of claims that mainly focus on getting the government to subsidize your production and erect trade barriers to foreign supplies to the USA. I don’t mind a few $Billion even (quite a lot of money) to be invested in research on biofules but just creating a massive payment, taxation and regulation scheme to funnel money to special interests is not a good idea.
Related: Peak Soil - Ethanol Demand Threatens Food Prices - Farming Without Subsidies in New Zealand - MIT’s Energy “Manhattan Project” - posts on energy - Is alcohol the energy answer? - Biofuels: Green energy or grim reaper? - Farming Washington for Handouts - Washington Waste - Paying Money it Doesn’t Have to Special Interests - China and the Sugar Industry Tax Consumers - Study Slams Economics Of Ethanol And Biodiesel
Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog © curiouscat.com 2005-2008 powered by WordPress
Curious Cat Alumni Connections
February 9th, 2008 at 9:27 am
“The biofuels themselves produce less greenhouse gases than fossil fuels, but not nearly enough to offset the carbon dioxide that is released when land is cleared and plowed up to produce crops…”