In her post, Antioxidants in Berries Increased by Ethanol (but Are Daiquiris Healthy?), Shelley Batts, commenting on a journal article which was written based on publicly funded research, used “ONE panel of ONE figure, and a chart, from over 10+ figures in the paper.” The for profit journal sent a threat of legal action. This is exactly the type of behavior that leads many (including me) to push for open access publication of publicly funded research.
It should be but many of the for profit publishers seem to have mistaken their mission to promote science (which would then generate funds to sustain their organization) for a mission to make money with no concern for science.
One comment on that post includes a link to the Standford Fair Use Project which looks like a great resource. Also see: Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation
Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog © curiouscat.com 2005-2008 powered by WordPress
Curious Cat Alumni Connections
May 28th, 2007 at 3:08 pm
[...] post mentions the recent bad publicity Wiley received. It seems to me the Journals still don’t understand that their copyright of research results [...]
June 16th, 2008 at 12:36 pm
Michael Arrington, at Techcrunch, has announced a new policy Here’s Our New Policy On A.P. stories: They’re Banned. Good for him…