The Economic Consequences of Investing in Science Education

Posted on February 20, 2008  Comments (2)

My comments on: National Association of High School Principals Takes Exception to Two Million Minutes

Thanks for saying what has to be said. I have talked on similar themes on my blog for awhile now. The USA is definitely losing its relative position as the clear leader for science and engineering excellence.

The debate now whether we are willing to invest more today to slow the decline or whether we are willing to risk the economic future where our centers of science and engineering excellence are eclipsed quickly.

There is a long lag time that has allowed us to coast for the last 30 or so years. The reality is that most Americans suffer under the illusion we are in the same position we were in 1970’s. We are not and it is obvious to me that the economic impacts are starting to have dramatic effects now and it will only increase.

It might be more pleasant to explain why the USA is fine the way it is but that is a mistake. For more on my thoughts see two categories of the Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog: Economics and primary science education and 2 posts: The Future is Engineering and the Political Impact of Global Technology Excellence.

2 Responses to “The Economic Consequences of Investing in Science Education”

  1. Jon
    February 15th, 2010 @ 10:01 am

    This is a great article. If anyone wants to follow it up with some insightful reading, grab a copy of Malcom Gladwell’s Outliers.

  2. Bacteria Living Inside Animals Cells » Curious Cat Science Blog
    October 2nd, 2011 @ 7:02 am

    Some sea slugs take the chloroplasts from algae they eat and incorporate it themselves, allowing them to get energy from light (photosynthesis): they become photosynthetic slugs…

Leave a Reply