Science Journal Publishers Stay Stupid

Posted on August 29, 2007  Comments (8)

Science publishers get even stupider by Andrew Leonard:

The American Association of Publishers and everyone associated with it should be ashamed of trying to protect their profit margins by slandering the open access movement as government intervention and censorship. Research paid for with government funds should be freely accessible to the general public.

I wish it was amazing that these people have so little grasp of what has been going on in the world the last 5 years (but I must say such failure to adapt seems to be a common trait in too many organizations). Previously I have posted on the importance of continuing the scientific tradition of open debate and open access. In the past there have been distribution complexities that made paid journals an acceptable compromise. That people working at journals don’t see that the internet changes that is going to lead to their rapid irrelevance. They had to figure this out a couple of years ago. Given they still haven’t, I must say that they really don’t seem to have much understanding of science or modern communication methods. Given their industry that is sad. It is time for the scientific community to give up on these journals and start looking to move to work with new organizations that will encourage scientific communication and advancement (PLoSarXiv.orgOpen Access Engineering Journals) and leave those that seek to keep outdated practices to go out of business.

“It is not necessary to change. Survival is not mandatory.” Dr. W. Edwards Deming

Related: Publishers launch an anti-OA lobbying organizationAnger at Anti-Open Access PROpen Access and PLoSHoward Hughes Medical Institute Takes Big Open Access StepThe Future of Scholarly Publication (our post from May 2005):

I do object to scientific knowledge being kept out of the scientific and public community. The ability to use the internet to more effectively communicate new knowledge should not be sacrificed to protect the old model journals had for sustaining themselves. They should find a way to fund themselves and make their material available for free on the internet (I think some delay for free public access would be fine – the shorter the delay the better). Or they should be replaced by others that do so.

8 Responses to “Science Journal Publishers Stay Stupid”

  1. Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Publishers Continue to Fight Open Access to Science
    September 21st, 2007 @ 7:44 pm

    […] that were founded to promote science so flawed in their thinking today. As I said last month in Science Journal Publishers Stay Stupid: “It is time for the scientific community to give up on these journals and start looking to […]

  2. Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » More Dinosaurs Fighting Against Open Science
    October 23rd, 2007 @ 8:58 pm

    […] I agree. It is sad that so many organizations distort behavior though poor management structures but that is the world we live in. My management improvement blog focused on how to manage better. And I have posted several times about the need to shift our support to open access science and away from those who want continue outdated strategies that restrict the advancement of scientific ideas. […]

  3. Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Google Knows it is a 2.0 World
    June 27th, 2008 @ 1:13 pm

    […] This is an important innovation management needs to acknowledge and manage. Or you can be like the poorly managed journal publishers or music industry that are destroying their organizations […]

  4. Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Tardigrades In Space (TARDIS)
    September 14th, 2008 @ 12:11 pm

    Research showing that Tardigrades (Water Bears) can survive in space without protection has been in the news lately…

  5. Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Merck and Elsevier Publish Phony Peer-Review Journal
    May 3rd, 2009 @ 10:47 am

    […] I have said the journals fighting open science should have their credibility questioned. They are putting their outdated business model above science. We should not see organizations that […]

  6. Harvard Steps Up Defense Against Abusive Journal Publishers » Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog
    April 24th, 2012 @ 7:15 pm

    […] more outrageous fees than they were already charging. As I said years ago it has become obvious they are enemies of science and should be treated as such. The time to find mutual beneficial solution past years […]

  7. How to Accelerate Quality Management Practices » Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
    November 21st, 2012 @ 3:52 am

    […] failing to adapt to the internet occasionally: ASQ has a long way to go in promoting quality, Science Journal Publishers Stay Stupid, Science Commons: Making Scientific Research […]

  8. George Box Articles Available for a Short Time » Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog
    May 14th, 2014 @ 3:18 am

    […] Francis is offering these articles freely in honor of George Box until December 31st, 2014. It is very sad that closed science and engineering journals block access to the great work created by scientists and engineers and most often paid for by government (while working for state […]

Leave a Reply