The annual ranking of research Universities are available from Shanghai’s Jiao Tong University. The methodology values publications and faculty awards which provides a better ranking of research (rather than teaching). Results from the 2008 rankings of Top 500 Universities worldwide, country representation of the top schools:
| location |
Top 100 |
% of World Population |
% of World GDP |
% of top 500 |
| USA |
54 |
4.6% |
27.2% |
31.6% |
| United Kingdom |
11 |
0.9 |
4.9 |
8.3 |
| Germany |
6 |
1.3 |
6.0 |
8.0 |
| Japan |
4 |
2.0 |
9.0 |
6.2 |
| Canada |
4 |
0.5 |
2.6 |
4.2 |
| Sweden |
4 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
2.2 |
| France |
3 |
0.8 |
4.6 |
4.6 |
| Switzerland |
3 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
1.6 |
| Australia |
3 |
0.3 |
1.6 |
3.0 |
| Netherlands |
2 |
0.2 |
1.4 |
2.4 |
| Denmark |
2 |
0.1 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
| Finland |
1 |
0.1 |
0.4 |
1.2 |
| Norway |
1 |
0.1 |
0.7 |
0.8 |
| Israel |
1 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
1.2 |
| Russia |
1 |
2.2 |
2.0 |
0.4 |
| China |
|
20.5 |
6.6 |
6.0 |
| India |
|
17.0 |
1.9 |
0.4 |
There is little change in most of the data from last year, which I think is a good sign, it wouldn’t make much sense to have radical shifts over a year in these rankings. Japan lost 2 schools in the top 100, France lost 1. Denmark (Aarhus University) and Australia (University of Sydney) gained 1. Last year there was a tie so there were 101 schools in the top 100.
The most dramatic data I noticed is China’s number of top 500 schools went from 14 to 30, which made me a bit skeptical of what caused that quick change. Looking more closely last year they reported the China top 500 totals as (China 14, China-Taiwan 6 and China-Hong Kong 5). That still gives them an impressive gain of 5 schools.
Singapore has 1 in the 102-151 range. Taiwan has 1 ranked in the 152-200 range, as do Mexico, Korea and Brazil. China has 9 in the 201-302 range (including 3 in Hong Kong). India has 2 in the 303-401 range.
University of Wisconsin – Madison is 17th again
My father taught there while I grew up.
Continue reading →
Symptom of America’s Decline in Particle Physics
Posted on September 11, 2008 Comments (5)
Land Of Big Science
Those advances came, in large measure, from the United States. The coming decades may be different.
…
A third of the scientists working at the LHC hail from outside the 20 states that control CERN. America has contributed 1,000 or so researchers, the largest single contingent from any non-CERN nation.
…
The U.S. contribution amounts to $500 million—barely 5 percent of the bill. The big bucks have come from the Europeans. Germany is picking up 20 percent of the tab, the British are contributing 17 percent, and the French are giving 14 percent.
…
The most worrying prospect is that scientists from other countries, who used to flock to the United States to be where the action is, are now heading to Europe instead.
This is a point I have made before. The economic benefits of investing in science are real. The economic benefits of having science and engineering centers of excellence in your country are real. That doesn’t mean you automatically gain economic benefit but it is a huge advantage and opportunity if you act intelligently to make it pay off.
Related: Invest in Science for a Strong Economy – Diplomacy and Science Research – Asia: Rising Stars of Science and Engineering – Brain Drain Benefits to the USA Less Than They Could Be – posts on funding science exploration – posts on basic research – At the Heart of All Matter
Categories: Economics, Funding, Science, Students
Tags: basic research, centers of excellence, CERN, commentary, economy, Europe, France, Funding, Germany, physics, Research, UK