Comments on: Science Journal Publishers Stay Stupid

By: Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Merck and Elsevier Publish Phony Peer-Review Journal

Sun, 03 May 2009 14:47:02 +0000

[...] I have said the journals fighting open science should have their credibility questioned. They are putting their outdated business model above science. We should not see organizations that [...]

By: Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Tardigrades In Space (TARDIS)

Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Tardigrades In Space (TARDIS) — Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:11:08 +0000

Research showing that Tardigrades (Water Bears) can survive in space without protection has been in the news lately…

By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Google Knows it is a 2.0 World

Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog » Google Knows it is a 2.0 World — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:13:35 +0000

[...] This is an important innovation management needs to acknowledge and manage. Or you can be like the poorly managed journal publishers or music industry that are destroying their organizations [...]

By: Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » More Dinosaurs Fighting Against Open Science

Wed, 24 Oct 2007 00:58:45 +0000

[...] I agree. It is sad that so many organizations distort behavior though poor management structures but that is the world we live in. My management improvement blog focused on how to manage better. And I have posted several times about the need to shift our support to open access science and away from those who want continue outdated strategies that restrict the advancement of scientific ideas. [...]

By: Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog » Publishers Continue to Fight Open Access to Science

Fri, 21 Sep 2007 23:44:20 +0000

[...] that were founded to promote science so flawed in their thinking today. As I said last month in Science Journal Publishers Stay Stupid: “It is time for the scientific community to give up on these journals and start looking to [...]