<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Relative Engineering Economic Positions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/14/relative-engineering-economic-positions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/14/relative-engineering-economic-positions/</link>
	<description>Science and Engineering: Innovation, Research, Education and Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 10:32:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; America&#8217;s Manufacturing Future</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/14/relative-engineering-economic-positions/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Management Improvement Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; America&#8217;s Manufacturing Future</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 22:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/14/relative-engineering-economic-positions/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] From my previous post, Relative Engineering Economic Positions: The hope some retained that the United States would retain the highest end work and others would work on the less complex work is not what the future holds. The future will prove to be an international marketplace where the United States is a significant but not dominant player. That future can still be bright but it requires a different vision than one in which American dominance is taken as a given. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] From my previous post, Relative Engineering Economic Positions: The hope some retained that the United States would retain the highest end work and others would work on the less complex work is not what the future holds. The future will prove to be an international marketplace where the United States is a significant but not dominant player. That future can still be bright but it requires a different vision than one in which American dominance is taken as a given. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Companies Not Countries</title>
		<link>http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/14/relative-engineering-economic-positions/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Curious Cat Science and Engineering Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Companies Not Countries</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 16:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://engineering.curiouscatblog.net/2005/11/14/relative-engineering-economic-positions/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] Relative Country Economic Success Relating to Science and Engineering [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Relative Country Economic Success Relating to Science and Engineering [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

